Hill

(PC) Moore v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20232:22-cv-00758California279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIDNI ALFRED MOORE, No. 2:22-cv-0758 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS RICK HILL, et al., Defendants. 16 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty- three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the court of a current address. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See L.R. 183(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.