Messer

(PC) Barrett v. Messer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20231:20-cv-01313California7,458 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUN MICHAEL BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01313-NODJ-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

v. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

M. MESSER, et al., (Docs. 31 & 32) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Shaun Michael Barrett is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of his original complaint on September 14, 2020. (Doc. 1.) Following initial screening, the Court appointed counsel for Plaintiff for the limited purpose of preparation and filing of a second amended complaint. (Doc. 14.) The second amended complaint was filed on March 7, 2022. (Doc. 18.) In its Second Screening Order issued February 10, 2023, the Court found Plaintiff’s second amended complaint stated the following cognizable claims: (1) due process violations 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.