John

(PC) Rysedorph v. John

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20231:23-cv-00251California5,866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED KRISTOPHER RYSEDORPH, Case No. 1:23-cv-00251-NODJ-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

JOHN, et al., (ECF No. 28) Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Jared Kristopher Rysedorph (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on February 21, 2023. Before the Court could screen Plaintiff’s complaint, Plaintiff sought leave to file an amended complaint. The Court granted the request. The Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 28.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.