(PC) Hesse v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20232:21-cv-01931California1,891 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HESSE, No. 2:21-cv-1931 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate, proceeding through counsel. Plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw. The deadline for opposing the motion expired and plaintiff did not file an opposition. As discussed below, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. Plaintiff is directed to show cause, within fourteen days, why the county defendants’ motion for summary judgment should not be granted. Plaintiff is granted thirty days to file an opposition to defendant Dr. Sanga’s motion for summary judgment or, if appropriate, file a motion under Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Motion to Withdraw Plaintiff’s counsel moves to withdraw based on a substantial and irreconcilable breakdown of the attorney-client relationship. Counsel seeks further relief to obtain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.