(PC) Taylor v. Commissioner of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20231:20-cv-00798California272 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRESTON TAYLOR, No. 1:20-cv-00798-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO

13 v. PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

14 COMMISSIONER OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF (ECF No. 127) 15 CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On December 28, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal of the action 21 with prejudice with each party bearing its own litigation costs and attorneys’ fees.1 (ECF No. 127.) 22 In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 24 dismissed with prejudice. 25 /// 26 /// 27 1 The Court notes that on December 22, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.