Toor

(PC) McNeil v. Toor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20241:19-cv-01257California9,990 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MCNEIL, Case No. 1:19-cv-01257-NODJ-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

v. (Doc. No. 63)

KIRAN TOOR, PAL VIRK, TIN-AUNG FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

SHWE, HARMINDER LONGIA, GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT1

Defendants. (Doc. No. 53)

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD2

18 19 20 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 53, “Motion”). Plaintiff filed an opposition and request for judicial notice in response to the Motion. (Doc. Nos. 63-64). Defendants filed a reply and a notice of errata pertaining to their reply. (Doc.

1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(17) (E.D. Ca. 2022). 2 On December 4, 2023, this case was assigned to the No District Judge (“NODJ”) docket due to the elevation of District Judge Ana I. de Alba to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.