(SS) Morrison v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20241:22-cv-01559California7,785 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

17 Plaintiff Terry Allen Morrison (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1.) The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate Judge.2 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was born on May 30, 1981, completed high school, and previously worked in food services. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 26, 27, 38, 48, 53, 63, 195, 200, 214, 216.) Plaintiff filed 26 1 On December 20, 2023, Martin O’Malley was named Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See https://www.ssa.gov/history/commissioners.html. He is therefore substituted as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in [their] official capacity, be the proper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.