Abraugh

Abraugh v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20231:23-cv-01387California565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN ABRAUGH, Case No. 1:23-cv-01387-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE STATUS REPORT AND CONTINUING THE v. MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO JANUARY 25, 2024 WALMART, INC., et al., (ECF No. 3) Defendants. DEADLINE: JANUARY 4, 2024

Plaintiff initiated this action on September 22, 2023 against Defendants Walmart, Inc. and Gregory Hanes. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not filed any proof of service and neither Defendant has appeared. The mandatory scheduling conference is set for January 4, 2024, and a joint scheduling report was due December 28, 2023. (ECF No. 3.) No joint report has been filed in this action. Rule 4(m) provides that “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.