Cisneros

(PC) Duncan v. Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20241:23-cv-01190California6,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, No. 1:23-cv-01190-NODJ-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE

v. ACTION T, CISNEROS, et al. (ECF No. 13) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on August 3, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On October 23, 2023, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the October 23, 2023 order. Therefore, on December 5, 2023, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has failed to respond to the order to show cause and the time to do so has now passed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.