Castillo

(PC) Gilmore v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20241:21-cv-00617California1,263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD D. GILMORE, No. 1:21-cv-00617 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

ORDER DIRECTING A DISTRICT JUDGE

D. CASTILLO, BE ASSIGNED TO THIS MATTER Defendant. ORDER RECOMMENDING MATTER BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDER AND FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

17 (ECF No. 12)

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE

JANUARY 16, 2024 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, the Clerk of Court will be ordered to randomly assign a District Judge to this matter, and/or in the alternative, to assign this matter a “NODJ” designation until a District Judge can be assigned to it. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.