Warden

(HC) Saxon v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20241:23-cv-01110California949 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL SAXON, No. 1:23-cv-01110-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

WARDEN, FCI-MENDOTA, TO GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS

Respondent. [Docs. 13]

17 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 19 On July 25, 2023, Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition. (Doc. 1.) On October 30, 20 2023, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. (Doc. 11.) Upon review of the motion, 21 the Court determined that additional documentation was necessary. In particular, the Court found 22 that it could not determine whether Petitioner was actually subject to a final order of removal 23 from the documentation provided. Accordingly, on December 6, 2023, the Court directed 24 Respondent to provide additional documentation. (Doc. 12.) 25 On December 20, 2023, Respondent submitted a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.