Unknown

(HC) Clarke v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20242:23-cv-03004California732 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEE KELLY CLARKE, No. 2:23-cv-3004 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the affidavit reveals petitioner is unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides that the petition: “shall specify all the grounds for relief which are available to the petitioner and of which he has or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have knowledge and shall set forth in summary form the facts supporting each of the grounds thus specified.” Rule 2(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Petitioner must also clearly state the relief sought in the petition. Id. Additionally, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.