Solares

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DORA SOLARES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00323-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ON PARTIES’ DISCOVERY

DISPUTE REGARDING PROTECTIVE

v. ORDER RALPH DIAZ, et al., (Doc. 68) Defendants. 16 I. BACKGROUND On November 22, 2023, the parties filed their Joint Statement Regarding a Discovery Dispute, in which they note that they disagreed on the duration of the confidentiality provision in a proposed protective order. (Doc. 68.) Plaintiff’s proposed duration language is as follows: 21 Once a case proceeds to trial, information that was designated as CONFIDENTIAL or maintained pursuant to this protective order used or introduced as an exhibit at trial becomes public and will be presumptively available to all of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in advance of the trial. See Kamakana, 447…