Warden

(HC) Ojo v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20242:23-cv-01096California302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OLANREWAJU TUNDE OJO, No. 2:23-cv-1096 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WARDEN, FCI-HERLONG, Respondents. 16 By order filed November 28, 2023, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why this action should not be dismissed. The thirty day period has expired, and petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.