McDow

McDow v. Harris

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20241:21-cv-00119California1,348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MCDOW, et al., No. 1:21-cv-00119-NODJ-SKO Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT BANK’S

MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO

HARRIS, et al., AMEND

Defendants. (Doc. No. 25) 16 17 This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Bank of America Corporate Center (“Bank”) on February 1, 2022, in response to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. (Def.’s Mot. Dismiss (ECF No. 25).) For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS Defendant Bank’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend. 1 I. BACKGROUND This litigation arises from a dispute among siblings regarding the provision of care and control of assets for their mother, Lily McDow, who suffered a stroke in 2019 26 1 In the interests of justice and addressing the heavy civil caseloads in the Fresno courthouse, the undersigned resolves only the pending motion to dismiss, ECF No. 25. Upon resolution of this motion,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.