Castillo

(PC) Washington v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20241:23-cv-01095California366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01095-JLT-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

FOLLOWING SCREENING

A. CASTILLO, et al., (Doc. 17) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington Thomas seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The magistrate judge recommended this action proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendant Castillo- Barajas, in his or her individual capacity, that Defendants Corona and Smith be dismissed, and any remaining claims be dismissed. (Doc. 17.) The magistrate judge advised Plaintiff that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of his rights on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.