Barba

(PC) Reid v. Barba

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20241:22-cv-00344California5,291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLTON REID, Case No. 1:22-cv-00344-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER DIRECTING

PLAINTIFF TO STAND ON THE

v. COMPLAINT AND VOLUNTARILY

DISMISS CLAIMS DEEMED NOT

JASON BARBA, COGNIZABLE; OR, Defendant. STAND ON COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO

COURT RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

CLAIMS DEEMED NOT COGNIZABLE TO

THE DISTRICT COURT1

17 (Doc. No. 8)

FEBRUARY 19, 2024 DEADLINE

19 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is the first amended pro se civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Carlton Reid—a prisoner. (Doc. No. 8, “FAC”). Upon review, the Court finds the FAC states a First Amendment access to courts claim against Defendant Jason Barba, but fails to state any other cognizable claims. The Court affords Plaintiff the option to file a notice to proceed only on his claim deemed cognizable or stand on his FAC subject to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.