Schultz
Schultz v. County of San Joaquin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL SCHULTZ, No. 2:19-cv-02468-DAD-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT DEPARTMENT, et al., (Doc. Nos. 28, 29) Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on two separate motions to dismiss, one filed on behalf of defendant Universal Protection Services (“UPS”), (Doc. No. 28), and the other filed on behalf of defendants San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department (the “County”)1, Sheriff Steve Moore, and Deputies Ayers, Bingham, Graham, Herrero, Hoskins, Kissell, Padilla, Reyes, Rust, and Whelen (collectively, “County defendants”), (Doc. No. 29-1). The pending motions were taken under ///// 23 In its pending motion to dismiss, defendant UPS notes that it has been erroneously named as Universal Protection Services and that its correct name is Universal Protection Service, LP. (Doc. No. 28 at 1–2.) …