Vasquez

(PC) Rockemore v. Vasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20241:21-cv-01339California634 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNTEZ K. ROCKEMORE, No. 1:21-cv-01339 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD

MOTION FOR SUBPOENAS

A. VASQUEZ, et al., (ECF No. 32) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. This case is at the discovery phase of the proceedings. See ECF No. 24 (Discovery and Scheduling Order). Before this Court is Plaintiff’s third motion that subpoenas issue in this case. ECF No. 32. For the reasons stated below, the request will be denied. I. MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS In the instant motion, Plaintiff asks that the Court issue “three signed but otherwise blank supoenas ad testificandums [sic], and a third signed but otherwise blank subpoena duces tecum.” ECF No. 32…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.