(PS) Charles v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CASSANDRA B. CHARLES, No. 2:23-cv-02200 DAD AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT,
15 Defendant.
17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). Plaintiff moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and was granted permission to do so. ECF Nos. 2, 3. Pursuant to the screening process accompanying IFP status, plaintiff’s initial complaint was rejected for failure to state a claim, and plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. On October 16, 2023, plaintiff filed a “statement” that the court construed as an amended complaint, but which again did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted and was again insufficient for the court to order service of process. ECF No. 4. The court rejected the amended complaint and gave plaintiff another…