Munoz

(PC) Harris v. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20241:21-cv-01800California835 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S. HARRIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01800-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS

TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY

v. PROCEEDINGS PENDING OUTCOME

OF CRIMINAL CASE

E. MUNOZ, et al., (Doc. 27) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On November 22, 2023, Defendants filed a motion to opt out of early ADR and a motion to stay the proceedings pending the outcome of a criminal case. (Doc. 27.) On December 21, 2023, the Court issued its Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Opt Out of Post-Screening ADR and Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Outcome of Criminal Case. (Doc. 28.) On December 26, 2023, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Motion: Opposing a Stay of Proceedings.” (Doc. 29.) // // II. DISCUSSION As noted above, on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.