Rojas

(PC) Dekharn v. Rojas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20242:23-cv-00706California287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMSON DEKHARN, No. 2:23-cv-00706 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. ROJAS, et al., Defendants.

17 By order filed November 2, 2023 (ECF No. 9), plaintiff’s complaint was screened and found not to not state any cognizable claims. The court granted plaintiff thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to respond to the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time granted has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.