Galyen
(PC) Fisher v. Galyen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AL GENE FISHER, Jr., Case No. 2:22-cv-01952-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND DENYING
GALYEN, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPOINT
COUNSEL
Defendants. ECF Nos. 28 & 29
AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS 18 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint and motion for the appointment of counsel. ECF Nos. 28 & 29. Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is granted. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, see Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court lacks the authority to require an attorney to represent plaintiff. See Mallard v. U.S.…