(PS) Peterson v. County of Sacramento Sheriff's Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20242:18-cv-00836California335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DESIREE PETERSON, Case No. 2:18-cv-00836-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND DENYING

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO HER MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., PAUPERIS AS UNNECESSARY 15 Defendants. ECF Nos. 17 & 19

AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS 18 19 Plaintiff, proceeding in forma pauperis and without counsel, filed this civil rights action against various Sacramento County Departments and employees. Plaintiff moves to amend her complaint and to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 17 & 19. Plaintiff’s motion to amend is granted, but her motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as unnecessary since the court previously granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 10. Plaintiff is notified that her amended complaint may only include claims that are related to those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.