Silveira

(PC) Jones Slaise v. Silveira

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20241:23-cv-00650California3,990 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEYTHAN MICHAEL JONES SLAISE, Case No. 1:23-cv-00650-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS CASE1

NICOLE A. SILVEIRA and VERNON H. WARNKE, (Doc. No. 7) 15 Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

17 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 7). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that the district court dismiss this action because the First Amended Complaint fails to state any cognizable constitutional claim and any further amendments would be futile. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Plaintiff commenced this action while in prison and thus is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), which requires, inter alia, the court to screen any complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, its officers, or its employees before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.