Palagummi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANCOIS GIVENS, No. 2:19-cv-0017 DAD KJN P Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING

CORRECTIONS AND ORDER

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On December 15, 2023, plaintiff filed a motion to extend the discovery deadline concerning supplemental responses to plaintiff’s interrogatories propounded to defendants Palagummi and Chapnick. On December 26, 2023, defendants filed a statement of non-opposition. “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably be met despite the…