Abraugh

Abraugh v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20241:23-cv-01387California359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN ABRAUGH, Case No. 1:23-cv-01387-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO CLOSE CASE v. AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO WALMART, INC., et al., RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 5)

Plaintiff initiated this action on September 22, 2023 against Defendants Walmart, Inc. and Gregory Hanes. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not file any proof of service and neither Defendant has appeared. In light of the scheduling conference set for January 4, 2024, the Court ordered a status report and continued the scheduling conference. (ECF No. 4.) On January 4, 2024, Plaintiff filed status report and a notice of voluntary dismissal of the entire action. (ECF Nos. 4, 5.) Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “a plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.