Lockwood
(PC) Rood v. Lockwood
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLTON JAMES ROOD, No. 2:19-cv-1806 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
LOCKWOOD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting a fourteen-day extension of time for any pending deadlines. ECF No. 98. The only potential deadlines at issue are the time for responding to defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 93) and plaintiff’s deadline to file a reply in support of his motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 98). Because those motions may be resolved without further briefing and are addressed below, the request for an extension of time will be denied as moot. Defendants moved to strike an affidavit filed by plaintiff’s mother in support of his motion for temporary restraining order, on the grounds that no such motion had been filed and plaintiff’s mother cannot prepare and file documents for plaintiff because she is not licensed to practice law in California. …