Dominic Investments v. Sentinel Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20242:22-cv-01450California455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

E-mail: andy.downs@bullivant.com Ted A. Smith, SBN 159986 E-mail: ted.smith@bullivant.com

BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.352.2700 Facsimile: 415.352.2701 6 Attorneys for Defendant Sentinel Insurance 7 Company, Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION DOMINIC INVESTMENTS, a California LLC; Case No.: 2:22-cv-01450-JAM-KJN ROSEVILLE FLOORING, INC., a California 13 corporation, STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CLAIM FOR "BRANDT Plaintiffs, FEES" 15 vs.

SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.,

17 a Connecticut corporation; THE HARTFORD; and DOES 1 to 10,

Defendants.

20 Plaintiffs Dominic Investments, and Roseville Flooring, Inc. and defendant Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiffs have made a claim for “Brandt Fees,” that is attorneys fees awarded pursuant to Brandt v. Superior Court, 37 Cal.3d 813 (1985). 2. In the event the jury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.