Van

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE E. ANDREYEV, No. 2:23-cv-01403-DJC-CKD PS Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AMY VAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Eugene E. Andreyev proceeds without counsel and seeks relief for alleged violations of his rights based on the seizure of his vehicle.1 The first amended complaint is before the court for screening. (ECF No. 4.) The amended complaint does not state a claim because plaintiff does not allege the defendants did not have a warrant to seize his vehicle. Plaintiff is granted another opportunity to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. I. Screening Requirement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d…