Diaz
(PC) Watson v. Diaz
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20241:23-cv-01750California1,132 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM XAVIER WATSON, JR., Case No. 1:23-cv-01750-EPG
Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD
v. NOT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST
DIAZ, ET AL.,
RESPONSE DUE IN 30 DAYS
Defendants.
14 William Watson, Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on December 21, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) It appears from the face of the Complaint that Plaintiff did not exhaust his available administrative remedies before filing this action. Plaintiff appears to admit that the grievance process was available to him, but that he did not complete the process. (ECF No. 1 at 3, 4.) Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to file a response within thirty days, explaining why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust available 23 …