Felder

(PC) Dedmon v. Felder

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20242:23-cv-00234California2,033 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DE'ANDRE L. DEDMON, SR., No. 2:23-cv-0234 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHAEL FELDER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court finds plaintiff fails to state a cognizable claim for relief. The FAC will be dismissed and plaintiff will be given an opportunity to file a second amended complaint to attempt to state a claim for relief. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at California State Prison, Los Angeles. He complains of conduct that occurred when he was incarcerated at California State Prison, Solano (“CSP-SOL”) in late 2022 and early 2023. On screening the original complaint, this court found plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims for relief under § 1983. (ECF No. 9.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.