Ramirez

Ramirez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20242:23-cv-02205California2,109 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BLANCA BALTAZAR RAMIREZ, No. 2:23-cv-02205-DAD-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND

WALMART ASSOCIATES, INC., (Doc. No. 8) Defendant.

16 This matter came before the court on December 19, 2023 for a hearing on plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the Yolo County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 8.) Attorney Samvel Geshgian appeared by video on behalf of plaintiff Blanca Baltazar Ramirez. Attorney Jane Rothbaler appeared by video on behalf of defendant Walmart Associates, Inc. For the reasons explained below, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion to remand. BACKGROUND On August 25, 2023, plaintiff filed this employment discrimination action against defendants Walmart Associates, Inc. (“defendant”) and unnamed Doe defendants 1–20 in the Yolo County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1-1 at 2.) In her complaint, plaintiff asserts the following seven causes of action: (1)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.