(PC) Rood v. Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20241:19-cv-01517California1,205 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLTON ROOD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01517-JLT-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

BALANCE OF FILING FEE OR FILE

v. UPDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION SCOTT FRAUENHEIM and N. FEBRUARY 9, 2024 DEADLINE

KEOVILAY-SEE,

15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On January 3, 2024, Plaintiff Colton Rood, who is proceeding pro se, filed a Notice of Change of Address indicating he was recently released from CDCR custody. (See Doc. No. 74). Because Plaintiff initiated this action while a prisoner and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (Doc. No. 15), he is “required to pay the full amount of a filing fee” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Based on Plaintiff’s “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint,” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), 26 1 The Court also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.