(PS) Collins v. Wells Fargo and Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN RAY COLLINS, et al, No. 2:23-cv-02676-DAD-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendant. 16 On December 6, 2023, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A filed a motion to dismiss.1 (ECF No. 9.) Defendant noticed its motion for a hearing to take place on February 27, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. before the undersigned. (Id.) Pursuant to this court’s Local Rules, any opposition to the motion was to be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the date the motion was filed; i.e., by December 20, 2023. Further, a responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion is required to serve and file a statement of non-opposition. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“[a] responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the motion in question”). That deadline has now passed, and plaintiffs have not filed either a statement of opposition…