Jones

(PS) Trillion v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20242:22-cv-02282California350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EZE NWANYI TRILLION, Case No. 2:22-cv-02282-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. TO SHOW CAUSE TABITHA ALLENE JONES, Defendant. 16 On November 21, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified plaintiff that it failed to state a claim, and allowed plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 5. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to administer justice expeditiously and avoid…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.