Khalib

(PC) Jackson v. Khalib

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20241:20-cv-01567California4,640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:20-cv-01567-NODJ-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

v. RESCIND THE SETTLEMENT

AGREEMENT

KHALIB, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE Defendants.

Plaintiff Cornel Jackson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been pending since November 2020 and proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Khalib, Quick, Alva, Villanueva, Lesage, Townsend, Cpl. Rivera and Officer Rivera, as well as an equal protection violation alleged against Defendant Garza. A settlement conference was held in this matter before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on September 26, 2023. (Doc. 40 [minutes].) The parties reached a settlement, the terms and conditions of which were noted on the record, and dispositional documents were to be filed within 60 days. (Id.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.