Lorenz

Lorenz v. Shepard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20241:23-cv-00604California1,243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 ALICIA LORENZ, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00604-JLT-EPG Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

13 v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY

M. SHEPARD, et al., WITH A COURT ORDER

15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 Plaintiffs Alicia Lorenz and Patrick Lorenz, Sr. (“Plaintiffs” or “Ms. Lorenz” and “Mr. Lorenz”) proceed pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed on April 19, 2023. (ECF No. 1). On October 12, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiffs’ complaint, concluding that Plaintiffs failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 6). The screening order directed Plaintiffs to either file a First Amended Complaint or notify the Court in writing that they wished to stand on their complaint, within thirty days. (Id. at p. 11). Plaintiffs have not followed either course of action, and the deadline to do so has passed.1 Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.