(PS) Legardy v. Taco Bell
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLETCHER LEGARDY Case No. 2:23-cv-01332-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. SCREENING THE COMPLAINT AND
GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION
TACO BELL, TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendant. ECF Nos. 1 & 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
17 Plaintiff filed a complaint purporting to assert claims against Taco Bell, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. His complaint, however, fails to state a claim, and I will recommend that it be dismissed with leave to amend. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Screening and Pleading Requirements A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is entitled to relief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and provide “enough facts to state a claim to…