Ruiz

(PC) Rhodes v. Ruiz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20241:21-cv-00942California683 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PERCY LEE RHODES, Case No. 1:21-cv-00942-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Doc. 42) v.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

JOSEPH RUIZ, et al.,

MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FOR

Defendants. 90 DAYS (Doc. 39)

16 Plaintiff Percy Lee Rhodes is a proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On December 15, 2023, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Order and Motion to Move the Court for a Stay of 90 Days and Change of Address.” (See Doc. 39.) On January 8, 2024, the Court issued its Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Defendants’ Failure to File an Opposition or Statement of Non- Opposition (Doc. 42) to Plaintiff’s pending motion. That same date, Defendants filed a Statement of Non-Opposition. (Doc. 43.) II. DISCUSSION Plaintiff seeks a 90-day stay of this action, stating that on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.