Bonta

(PS) Rogers v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20242:22-cv-01157California687 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01157-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. THAT DEFENDANT COOPER RESPOND

TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

ROB BONTA, et al., COMPLAINT AND THE CLERK’S OFFICE

ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE

Defendants. DEFENDANT SANCHEZ ECF No. 26 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANT BONTA BE

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EFFECT

SERVICE OBJECTIONS DUE WITH FOURTEEN

DAYS

23 24 On December 19, 2022, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why defendants Bonta 25 and Sanchez should not be dismissed for failure to effect service of process within the time 26 prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). ECF No. 17. Plaintiff did not file a 27 response. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.