(SS) Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20241:22-cv-01636California5,023 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL WILCE JOHNSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-01636-EPG Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

13 v. SECURITY COMPLAINT 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF Nos. 1, 9). SECURITY, Defendant. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding his application for disability insurance benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff presents the following issues: (1) Did the ALJ apply the medical vocational profiles accurately? (2) Did the ALJ address the combination of impairments in the RFC? (3) Did the ALJ fail to provide clear and convincing reasons to find Mr. Johnson’s statements not persuasive?…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.