Gaefcke

Gaefcke v. Flatiron West, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20241:23-cv-01470California619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES GAEFCKE, on behalf of himself and Case No. 1:23-cv-01470-NODJ-CDB others similarly situated,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF

Plaintiff, COURT TO CLOSE CASE PURSUANT v. TO RULE 41(a)(1) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FLATIRON WEST, INC., et al. (Doc. 21) Defendants. 16 Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge

17 On September 12, 2023, Plaintiff James Gaefcke (“Plaintiff”) commenced an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern, asserting claims on behalf of himself and a putative class of others similarly situated. (Doc. 1-2). On October 12, 2023, Defendant Flatiron West, Inc. (“Flatiron”) filed an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 1 at 2). The next day, Flatiron removed this action to this Court. Id. On October 19, 2023, Defendant Dragados USA, Inc., filed an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 9). On November 16, 2023, Flatiron…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.