(PC) Jaime v. Kern Medical

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20241:23-cv-01145California3,387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL JAIME, No. 1:23-cv-01145-NODJ-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF

KERN MEDICAL, et al. (ECF No. 14) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed November 2, 2023. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.