(PC) Bennett v. Monroe Detention Center
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BENNETT, No. 2:22-cv-2157 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MONROE DETENTION CENTER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s original complaint alleged that his right to access the court has been denied, he has been retaliated against, and he has not received adequate mental health treatment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time and to appoint counsel (ECF No. 23), motions for recusal (ECF Nos. 24, 27), motion to appoint a guardian ad litem (ECF No. 25), motion for an extension of time and to appoint counsel or a guardian ad litem (ECF No. 26), motion to expedite his request for a guardian ad litem (ECF No. 28), and motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 29). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will grant plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion for an…