Ingram

(PC) Taylor v. Ingram

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20242:21-cv-01042California1,876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:21-cv-01042 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARSHA INGRAM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Kenneth Lee Taylor is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant retaliated against him in violation of his First Amendment Rights. Presently before the court is defendant’s fully briefed motion to compel. (ECF No. 30.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will grant defendant’s motion to compel and direct plaintiff to supplement his responses. I. Background This action proceeds solely on plaintiff’s claim that defendant violated his rights under the First Amendment. (ECF Nos. 7, 10, 11.) Specifically, plaintiff alleges that defendant filed a “false and fabricated” rules violation report and had plaintiff transferred to another housing unit because plaintiff informed defendant he intended to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.