Adavco, Inc. v. Deertrail Development LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20241:23-cv-00695California2,584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADAVCO, INC., Case No. 1:23-cv-00695-JLT-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING,

GRANTING DEFENDANT MCINTOSH

vs. & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC.’S

MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF

DEERTRAIL DEVELOPMENT LLC; NEW DEFAULT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF GEN ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.; and ADAVCO, INC.’S MOTION FOR MCINTOSH & ASSOCIATES DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS MOOT

ENGINEERING, INC.,

(Docs. 33 & 35) Defendants. 15 _____________________________________/ 16 Presently before the Court is the motion of Defendant McIntosh & Associates Engineering, Inc. (“Defendant McIntosh”) to set aside the Clerk’s entry of default. (Doc. 35.) No party filed an opposition. The motion is therefore deemed unopposed. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(c). The Court finds the motion for reconsideration suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the hearing set for January 24,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.