Payne

Payne v. Merced County Public Defender's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20241:22-cv-00157California5,266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACOB PAYNE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00157-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. (Doc. 60) MERCED COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Currently before the Court is a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants County of Merced, Kathleen Crookham, Deidre F. Kelsey, John Pedrozo, and Hubert Walsh Jr. (“Defendants”) on May 12, 2023. (Doc. 60.) Plaintiff Jacob Payne (“Plaintiff”) opposed the motion on May 27, 2023, and Defendants replied on June 6, 2023. (Docs. 68, 71.) Plaintiff also filed a notice of supplemental authority on September 22, 2023. (Doc. 74.) Having carefully considered the briefing filed by all parties, and for the reasons detailed below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss will be denied. I. Background Plaintiff’s action arises from his detention for more than eleven years pending trial on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.