Hamman
(PC) Porter v. Hamman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN LAMAR PORTER, No. 1:23-cv-01468-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE
v. (ECF No. 10) VIVIAN HAMMAN, et al.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
Defendants. RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
TO THIS ACTION
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
CERTAIN CLAIM
14 (ECF No. 11)
16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
18 On November 22, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found that he stated a 19 cognizable retaliation and Bane Act violation against Defendant Hamman, and granted Plaintiff 20 thirty days to either file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed only on 21 the claims found to be cognizable. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or 22 notify the Court of his intent to proceed only on the cognizable claims. Therefore, on January 2, 23 2024, the Court ordered…