Jasso

(PC) Spencer v. Jasso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20241:20-cv-00909California1,902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD B. SPENCER, No. 1:20-cv-0909 NODJ GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE

v. DEFENSES J. JASSO, et al., (ECF No. 25) Defendants. DEFENDANT’S AMENDED ANSWER

RELATED TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

THREE AND SEVEN OR

ALTERNATIVELY, STATEMENT

DECLINING TO AMEND DUE JANUARY 26, 2024

19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 20 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 21 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 Before this Court is Plaintiff’s motion to strike Defendant’s affirmative defenses. ECF 23 No. 25. Defendant has filed an opposition to it (see ECF No. 26), and the period within which 24 Plaintiff could have filed a reply has expired (see Local Rule 230(l)). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.